In the new expression he uses President Joan Laporta gave rise to numerous interpretations. What exactly did you mean by the sociological madridism?
Sure There are many examples or reasons why Laporta coined the phrase, but surely some of it is due to recurring instances like these:
When you see it some members of competition commissions, at that time, appeals or other courts are partners They either were or have a clear white past.
When you see Barcelona outplay you in a match, they will win in a good fight and all the comments They refer to whether he should have received a second yellow card or whistled for a shove in the area in favor of Madrid. without recognizing the justice of the opponent’s victory.
When you see a team record an era that is the envy and legacy of the entire football world, with an impressive coach and a team that reaches the Ballon d’Or podium with three of its players: Messi, Xavi and Iniesta and all you can think of is talking about Villarato and permanent arbitration assistance.
When You win title after title on the pitch and let it slip in Barcelona Doping practices are used that would justify much of their success.
When the contract of the best player in the world is published in full with the chance to cause confusion and destabilize the club under a flashy headline: “Messi ruins Barça”.
Barcelona is a rival, for many even an enemy, of the most powerful club in the country, and that has to be paid for, it takes a heavy toll. It is not easy to be on the other side of a club as economically, socially, institutionally and sportingly strong as Madrid.No.
Barcelona is already quite Cainite that he would not need to be the center of so many enemies.
The latest example would be if the World Cup final was decided with two new stadiums. and from the capital, only the opportunity to play at the Santiago Bernabéu is valued, even though the Camp Nou has several thousand more seats.
At that time, other terms were coined to define the constant attacks against Barcelona that always came from the same places, the so-called “Madrid media cave”.
And it is true that all this should not hide the mistakes that the club has made during its history of more than 100 years, logically, the latest so-called Negreiro caseit would just be missing, but it is clear that it is greatly enlarged from the so-called sociological madridism and with powerful speakers.
In addition to all this, from more recent examples a a few other examples that quickly come to mindand I’m sure I think this is what Laporta calls sociological madridism.
